Information about the cookies used on the website
We use cookies on our website to improve the performance and content of the site. The cookies enable us to provide a more individual user experience and social media channels.

Feedback on Project Results

Validating Road-STEAMer Outcomes

Feedback on Project Results

* Required fields are marked with an asterisk

Step 1 of 5

Continue

Step 2 of 5

The policy gap analysis examines to what extent existing educational policies promote and support effective STEAM education. The analysis compares a corpus of identified existing policies against desired policy characteristics in three dimensions: STEAM curriculum, STEAM context, and STEAM agenda.

Read the complete document at Analysis of policy gaps for STEAM.

1 2 3 4 5
Overall, there is no comprehensive policy making promoting and supporting a holistic approach to STEAM. At best, STEAM support is partial/fragmented
Only some sub-dimensions of the STEAM curriculum are covered, mostly overemphasising STEAM as an instrument for STEM
There is a need for a more comprehensive curriculum including both science and arts literacy as well as other dimensions of STEAM such as collaboration, disciplinary inter-relationships, thinking-making-doing, creativity, real-world connection, inclusion-personalization-empowerment
There is a need to support the establishment of stronger learning environments that can enable or promote autonomy, flexibility, collaboration and an innovation-friendly climate in all educational/training settings
There is a need to make STEAM education relevant and inclusive for all, comprehensively covering gender, ethnic, socio-economic, ability aspects (intersectionality)
Back Continue

Step 3 of 5

Following the identification of policy gaps and needs in STEAM education across Europe, 8 actionable policy recommendations have been developed to enhance STEAM education at local, national and EU levels, with a specific focus on Horizon Europe.

Explore the proposed Policy Recommendations and assess their potential impact on policymaking.

1 2 3 4 5
(1) Redefine STEAM as a Holistic Curriculum
(2) Develop STEAM Learning Materials and Teacher Resources
(3) Prioritise STEAM Training for Educators
(4) Foster Collaborative Learning Environments
(5) STEAM for Societal Impact
(6) Encourage Partnerships with Industry
(7) Broaden the Scope of Inclusion Policies
(8) Promote Intersectional Approaches in STEAM
Back Continue

Step 4 of 5

Building on the defined policy recommendations, the STEAM roadmap provides a concrete actionable plan for STEAM education in EU funding programs, with a focus on Horizon Europe (2023–2027) and the upcoming Framework Program FP10 (2028–2034), but also Erasmus+.

We invite you to review the STEAM roadmap for Science Education in Horizon Europe and share your insights.

1 2 3 4 5
The roadmap is helpful in understanding the overview of the actions
The presentation and organization of the information is easy for me to process
The roadmap presents mutually consistent actions, goals and policies
The roadmap does not overtax available resources and does not create unsolvable sub-problems
The roadmap provides various solutions for future EU funding
The roadmap is helpful for understanding the systemic approach proposed
Back Continue

Step 5 of 5

Last question and a big thank you for participating in Road-STEAMer!

1 2 3 4 5
Participating in Road-STEAMer-related initiatives was an enriching and overall positive experience
I feel that my trust in science and research outcomes increased after participating in the activity of this project

TBD

Back

You need to enable all cookies in order to see this content.

Change cookie settings